Skip Navigation



Journal of Environmental Law Advance Access published online on March 9, 2008

Journal of Environmental Law, doi:10.1093/jel/eqn006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howarth, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Interpretation of ‘Precaution’ in the European Community Common Fisheries Policy

William Howarth*

*University of Kent (W.Howarth{at}kent.ac.uk). An earlier draft of this article was helpfully commented on by Donald McGillivray, University of Kent, and delivered and discussed at the Conference of the Society of Legal Scholars at the University of Durham on 12 September 2007. The author is extremely grateful for these comments and those of the Editor of this Journal and anonymous reviewers, but remains entirely responsible for any errors that remain.


   Abstract

The European Community Environment Policy and the need for integration of environmental requirements in sectoral policies raise markedly different issues in the different contexts in which they need to be applied. The application of the precautionary principle to the ‘prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources’ contrasts with its application in pollution control contexts. The need for precaution in the management of fisheries resources is considered against the backdrop of the reformed (post-2002) Community Common Fisheries Policy. This recognises the need to adopt a precautionary approach and, progressively, an ecosystem-based approach. These innovations are assessed through their application to catch limits under stock recovery plans. The interpretation of ‘precaution’ that has been adopted is contrasted with stricter alternatives. Given the potential costs of precaution, there may be good reasons for its progressive application, but, if the reforms fail to achieve their ecological objectives, a stronger version of precaution will be needed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.